By Briscoe Pugh
For According to me...By B
Political and social divergence and the various ways each shapes and informs the other reflects the desperation of a world wherein people feel more and more comfortable speaking and dealing in absolutes.
True center has been lost.
If you happen to be what is deemed a “right winger” or identify most consistently with the perspective most readily recognizable as conservative, it has become something of a requirement now that you express a reflexive condemnation of everything even slightly left of that stated position. Though once only embraced by fringe elements of the conservative contingent, this reflex has been encouraged (largely by way of conscious neglect) by conservative leadership who rode the crest of a tidal wave of conservative extremism...which I tend to believe they found wasn’t as much fun once they fell off of it and the wave crashed into the shore.
Too many amongst the conservative family tend to have embraced a reflex whereby one “squares off” and “throws blows” in order to get the bloodthirsty (on either side) to cheer for someone to “win the fight” as opposed to addressing an issue so that problems may be solved.
It seems now to be considered a actual “virtue” by conservatives to find something...anything to make a lot of people afraid of, then jump on board while the rank and file load shotguns, light torches and quote bible verses in pursuit of their “foreign/radical/just plain NOT THEM” quarry.
For my liberal and/or “left-wing” brethren and sistren:
Many of us had been lulled to sleep. There was this idea that the ever-elusive, modern, manifestation of true “antidisestablishmentarianism” had somehow been realized by one incredibly articulate, hugely dynamic, ambitious “multi-ethnic” having been elected as U.S. President. So many of us were so busy basking in the euphoria of that moment that we’d forgotten to serve the purpose we are supposed to serve as human beings in a politically precarious landscape:
Speak truth to power and hold influence accountable.
Our absolute support for our brother and EVERYTHING he did or proposed drove too many of us into a wholesale denial reflex, wherein any opposition to him, his methods or his policies were seen as some sort of attack or affront to him as a person. This stance gained particular support when it was apparent that those on the conservative end of things WERE actually resorting to personal attacks and outright lies to somehow denigrate any policy he deemed necessary as President (a.k.a. “The Black dude now holding the bag after the heist”).
Let’s be clear that it isn’t safe as a practical matter to lavish one’s trust onto ANY U.S. President. By virtue of maintaining the positioning of the United States in the world arena, a U.S. President has to become a liar, thief and murderer by cold, hard necessity.
I can no more condone his actions simply because he looks a bit more like me than every other president than I can despise the totality of someone else’s because they look nothing like me.
He is indeed my brother...and for that reason I am all the more critical of him...just as I am with myself and my people.
He needs us...not as “yes people,” but as a check and balance to the conscience he campaigned for each of us to follow in terms of how we judge all who govern.
Yes, my people...I believe that euphoric acquiescence can be just as extreme as blind hatred.
I also find that too many of my beautiful people on the liberal side of things find it necessary (as conservatives do as well) to embrace “B.S.” ideological issues over (and often in direct conflict with) practicality.
I keep seeing a particular liberal commentator (whom I actually like) rail against the size of the ammunition magazines used by Jared Lee Loughner when he shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (and several others...some fatally) in Tucson in January. The issue he seems to have clung to is one those who seek more prohibitive gun legislation will often (erroneously) cite.
The issue I speak of is that which is raised about Loughner having had 30 round magazines for his Glock 9mm, semiautomatic pistol. The standard magazine that comes in the box with the weapon at purchase holds 15 rounds...which is typical of most standard size 9mm handguns.
To put it plainly:
Loughner would have been no less dangerous without the 30-round magazine (which is a popular aftermarket item). When dealing with a weapon which can be reloaded and readied to shoot in a matter of 2 seconds (even less with practice), there then exists no real difference between his 30-round aftermarket mag and the two 15 round mags which came with it.
Again...this is but one example of stupidity from what I see as a liberal reflex that loses its grip on practical matters by way of a conspicuous lack of information.
But, alas...
I think the world over the last few months has actually helped show the liberal family what it actually means to speak actual, relevant truth to power.
The rampant uprisings in the Arab world by the poor and the oppressed against machines put in place specifically to suppress the very rebellions they engage in RIGHT NOW is sending a message to those everywhere that
a) political power can be shaped by the people if they have the fortitude to COLLECTIVELY dissent and resist
b) financial backing and lobbying are NOTHING without the collective will of the people
The protests in Wisconsin, Ohio and Iowa on behalf of collective bargaining rights for public employee unions are perfect examples of this. (Note: I actually don’t believe that the actions and voices of those who protest in these states will be heeded ultimately. I personally believe the conservative establishment will run over EVERYTHING they propose, largely because the conservative establishment feels it has a point to prove by moving against unions and can always justify it in this struggling economy by quoting dollar amounts and framing the term “collective bargaining” as something inherently evil and corrupt.)
My point here is that the lack of a true “center” in socio-political discourse is causing the exchange to be inherently corrupt.
The only way to truly attack things from the center, to at least attempt an objective perspective is to acknowledge ONE crucial commonality:
Our collective humanity.
Once ALL parties in any discussion can do THAT...
That is, find our center by individually centering ourselves...we are actually having a discussion and not some battle of attrition.
Peace and progress, my people.
Monday, March 14, 2011
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
When People Decide They ARE ‘God’s Wrath,’ What’s To Stop Them?
By
Briscoe Pugh
For According to Me... By B
I know that I have dealt with the issue of peoples’ perceptions of God before in our beautiful, little place here.
Here’s the thing...
As far as I’m concerned, this subject will continue to be the gift that keeps on giving as long as there are those who tie religion and their concept of God to their national identity and affect policy along those lines.
The subject of a woman’s right to choose has been in the news recently, among other issues.
Some conservative lawmakers have chosen to propose legislation in a certain state to make miscarriage a criminal offense.
In 2 other states, bills have been introduced wherein there is language that seeks to rule as justifiable homicide the killing of someone, whose reasonably presumed intent is to harm a fetus. The text of this particular bill authorizes the use of deadly force in defense of an unborn child.
I have several issues with this bill:
-The language in the bill itself is redundant and superfluous. An unborn child, while being a distinct being unto itself is still PART OF THE MOTHER who carries it. The health of a pregnant mother and her unborn child are inexorably linked. Each one affects the other. It is a basic biological fact that any harm that one inflicts upon the child will harm the mother (save for ONE specific circumstance, which I will address shortly).
-In order to bring harm to a fetus, one must inflict harm upon the mother carrying it. Any attack to either would prompt action that is already on the books as self-defense from the mother’s perspective.
-The one most specific scenario wherein the fetus would be in tangible danger but the mother is not necessarily, would be (wait for it)...during the abortion procedure...of course.
So...now, in this latest push of an ideologically driven agenda, the extreme (so-called) Right seeks to open the door to anyone who believes a fetus is being harmed the right to take action by way of deadly force.
Might this become a license to kill abortion doctors?
Common sense is punching me in the chest by even asking that question.
Now, whatever your stated (or unstated) position might be in the pro-choice debate, I think it is important to consider that many of those who claim to be “pro-life” also seem to be markedly “pro-murder”, “pro-intimidation”, and ” pro-violence” in the heat of what they consider to be doing “God’s will.”
When one follows this legislation through to fruition, what happens with zealots who already believe they are justified in whatever violent actions they decide to employ in opposition to abortion, abortion clinics and all whom they employ? Are they now able to use this as a defense in a trial proceeding? Would a trial proceeding even be necessary, as long as it can be proven that they stopped an abortion in progress?
I am also driven to wonder about what the bill would make of a mother who smokes, and/or drinks during pregnancy or perhaps neglects pre-natal care for whatever reason and her unborn child dies. What about the mother who can’t afford proper pre-natal care and miscarries? What about pregnant, working, moms (which most are these days) who can’t afford to stop working (even on doctor’s orders) because they are the only income for an existing family and miscarries from overwork?
Would mothers also fall under the letter of the law as having murdered their unborn babies from what essentially are circumstances they cannot help?
This is the issue with legislating based on dogmas to which people are emotionally attached and religiously convicted.
This very same reflex that drove so many to support a certain state’s immigration legislation that ultimately does not actually support the (federal) immigration process already in place...but does intend to fill up jails with undocumented, Spanish speakers...
...jails which that particular state’s governor is working REALLY hard to privatize.
This same reflex also has people so angry and terrified of anything and anyone they might think is Arab or Muslim (which my people whom are even the slightest bit aware know are NOT the same thing mind you) or even non-Christian that legislation is also being introduced in some states to prohibit Sharia law.
You can’t see me right now, but I am laughing at that one. (lol)
Let us consider for a second that the majority of those who oppose this big, boogey man they are calling Sharia have what could be considered a fairly “loose” understanding of what Sharia actually is.
Let us also consider that even the examples they do seem to cite illustrating Sharia tend to point more to localized tribal customs that became fused with the Muslim communities interpretations of Islam and not actual, quranic mandates.
Let’s also recognize the fact that the U.S. Constitution ALREADY addresses both the “impending wave of Sharia law” as well as the opposition to such in the First Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
Basically, religiously based law is against the law, and restricting ANYONE’S individual expression of their religious beliefs is also against the law...according to the document so many who support the aforementioned examples of sanctioned xenophobia and extremism pay so much lip service to wanting to “get back to”.
The Constantinian influence on Christianity (amongst a great many other factors) helped to transform a prophetic tradition into one more means of social control endorsed directly by the state. When the state endorses a specific religious perspective (even if only by way of the proverbial "back door" of cultural norms), it is only a matter of time and consequence before the exclusion of all other perspectives becomes a mandate for personal and institutional legitimacy:
"...one nation under God..." in pledges of children’s' allegiance...
"...in God we trust..." on currency...while at the same time holding up "Old Glory" and proclaiming faith in "God AND Country..."
...pushing for prayer in schools, while condemning, harassing and attacking those who pray differently than what is deemed the societal norm...
I believe that it is these instances and those like them where we witness the crucible of human fears and insecurities spawning localized neuroses and making them acceptable and palatable...even preferred.
God help us...
Or better yet...
God help us to help ourselves.
Peace and progress, my people.
Briscoe Pugh
For According to Me... By B
I know that I have dealt with the issue of peoples’ perceptions of God before in our beautiful, little place here.
Here’s the thing...
As far as I’m concerned, this subject will continue to be the gift that keeps on giving as long as there are those who tie religion and their concept of God to their national identity and affect policy along those lines.
The subject of a woman’s right to choose has been in the news recently, among other issues.
Some conservative lawmakers have chosen to propose legislation in a certain state to make miscarriage a criminal offense.
In 2 other states, bills have been introduced wherein there is language that seeks to rule as justifiable homicide the killing of someone, whose reasonably presumed intent is to harm a fetus. The text of this particular bill authorizes the use of deadly force in defense of an unborn child.
I have several issues with this bill:
-The language in the bill itself is redundant and superfluous. An unborn child, while being a distinct being unto itself is still PART OF THE MOTHER who carries it. The health of a pregnant mother and her unborn child are inexorably linked. Each one affects the other. It is a basic biological fact that any harm that one inflicts upon the child will harm the mother (save for ONE specific circumstance, which I will address shortly).
-In order to bring harm to a fetus, one must inflict harm upon the mother carrying it. Any attack to either would prompt action that is already on the books as self-defense from the mother’s perspective.
-The one most specific scenario wherein the fetus would be in tangible danger but the mother is not necessarily, would be (wait for it)...during the abortion procedure...of course.
So...now, in this latest push of an ideologically driven agenda, the extreme (so-called) Right seeks to open the door to anyone who believes a fetus is being harmed the right to take action by way of deadly force.
Might this become a license to kill abortion doctors?
Common sense is punching me in the chest by even asking that question.
Now, whatever your stated (or unstated) position might be in the pro-choice debate, I think it is important to consider that many of those who claim to be “pro-life” also seem to be markedly “pro-murder”, “pro-intimidation”, and ” pro-violence” in the heat of what they consider to be doing “God’s will.”
When one follows this legislation through to fruition, what happens with zealots who already believe they are justified in whatever violent actions they decide to employ in opposition to abortion, abortion clinics and all whom they employ? Are they now able to use this as a defense in a trial proceeding? Would a trial proceeding even be necessary, as long as it can be proven that they stopped an abortion in progress?
I am also driven to wonder about what the bill would make of a mother who smokes, and/or drinks during pregnancy or perhaps neglects pre-natal care for whatever reason and her unborn child dies. What about the mother who can’t afford proper pre-natal care and miscarries? What about pregnant, working, moms (which most are these days) who can’t afford to stop working (even on doctor’s orders) because they are the only income for an existing family and miscarries from overwork?
Would mothers also fall under the letter of the law as having murdered their unborn babies from what essentially are circumstances they cannot help?
This is the issue with legislating based on dogmas to which people are emotionally attached and religiously convicted.
This very same reflex that drove so many to support a certain state’s immigration legislation that ultimately does not actually support the (federal) immigration process already in place...but does intend to fill up jails with undocumented, Spanish speakers...
...jails which that particular state’s governor is working REALLY hard to privatize.
This same reflex also has people so angry and terrified of anything and anyone they might think is Arab or Muslim (which my people whom are even the slightest bit aware know are NOT the same thing mind you) or even non-Christian that legislation is also being introduced in some states to prohibit Sharia law.
You can’t see me right now, but I am laughing at that one. (lol)
Let us consider for a second that the majority of those who oppose this big, boogey man they are calling Sharia have what could be considered a fairly “loose” understanding of what Sharia actually is.
Let us also consider that even the examples they do seem to cite illustrating Sharia tend to point more to localized tribal customs that became fused with the Muslim communities interpretations of Islam and not actual, quranic mandates.
Let’s also recognize the fact that the U.S. Constitution ALREADY addresses both the “impending wave of Sharia law” as well as the opposition to such in the First Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
Basically, religiously based law is against the law, and restricting ANYONE’S individual expression of their religious beliefs is also against the law...according to the document so many who support the aforementioned examples of sanctioned xenophobia and extremism pay so much lip service to wanting to “get back to”.
The Constantinian influence on Christianity (amongst a great many other factors) helped to transform a prophetic tradition into one more means of social control endorsed directly by the state. When the state endorses a specific religious perspective (even if only by way of the proverbial "back door" of cultural norms), it is only a matter of time and consequence before the exclusion of all other perspectives becomes a mandate for personal and institutional legitimacy:
"...one nation under God..." in pledges of children’s' allegiance...
"...in God we trust..." on currency...while at the same time holding up "Old Glory" and proclaiming faith in "God AND Country..."
...pushing for prayer in schools, while condemning, harassing and attacking those who pray differently than what is deemed the societal norm...
I believe that it is these instances and those like them where we witness the crucible of human fears and insecurities spawning localized neuroses and making them acceptable and palatable...even preferred.
God help us...
Or better yet...
God help us to help ourselves.
Peace and progress, my people.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
The Game
By Celena Howard
For Sassy C~E~O
After being canceled for two years, "The Game" returned Jan. 11 with the premiere of its fourth season. The show was dropped by The CW in 2009 and was picked up early last year by BET.
I was a HUGE fan of the game as I found the show to be entertaining with the perfect combination of drama and humor. However, I must admit I have been dissapointed with the first few episodes of season four. I do however see the potential of things getting better (keeping my fingers crossed). My favorite couple of past seasons is Melanie Barnett and Derwin Davis. I rooted for their love to persevere and followed them through the ups and downs of their relationship. However, this season it appears as if they are making Melanie vendictive, manipulative, and maybe even a little money hungry. I understand jealousy and feel as though it should be addressed, but don’t let it destroy my sweet little Melanie. I still love Derwin’s character. After having some questions regarding the true paternity of his son, he showed heartfelt emotion and even forgave Melanie who wrestled with the decision to tell him the truth about getting bad DNA results and that his son was really his. He also emerged as a superstar player, getting numerous endorsement deals, including Nike, and becoming the new face of the Sabers organization, yet he remains humble. GO DERWIN!!
Another couple who brought fun dynamics to the show is Jason and Kelly. The show focused on Jason’s frugal ways and Kelly’s attempt to gain a sense of self. After dealing with some serious topics such as steroid use, finance issues, and distrust, the couple finally divorced. I am still feeling Jason’s character this season, he is too funny. I’m not sure about Kelly’s new role as a reality TV star yet, I need to see more.
Malik Wright, can you say TRAIN WRECK. I have always liked Malik’s character; a little cocky with a touch of arrogance and a hint of decency. Oh, and it doesn’t hurt that he is fine. I HATE the new direction that Malik’s character is going in. He was always cocky and arrogant, but it is now being overshadowed by obnoxious and uncompassionate behavior. He has turned into a real a**hole with an alcohol problem that is spiraling out of control. I miss the old Malik who use to have a sense of loyalty and respect towards his best-friend, who dated a woman who did not fit the public’s idea of beauty despite being teased about it, and who drew the line when Melanie tried to sleep with him by offering her some good advice and sending her home to work on her relationship with Derwin.
Another great character with a lot of spunk and attitude is Tasha Mac, a hard-working, dedicated, and driven business woman who tells it like it is. But for some strange reason, the writers decided to tag her with even more “ghetto” stereotypes. Don’t get me wrong, I am not judging my Black and Mild smoking sisters, but Tasha went from smoke-free to puffing on a mild…what the f@*k. And what about her much younger man Terrance? Ok, no comment on that, I am 40 something now so I don’t want to have to eat my words.
My final thoughts on THE GAME are that it has lots of potential because fans of the show have already fallen in love with the characters. However, if the writers change the characters too much and they lose a sense of authenticity, I can see a cancellation in the shows near future. I don’t think the show went off of the air because it was a bad show and that is why viewers wrote letters and protested to get the show back on. With that being said, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. If they keep the characters intact and create exciting new story lines that fit those characters, the show should have much success.
THE CAST OF THE GAME
Melanie Barnett-Davis (Tia Mowry) - In season one, Melanie is a medical student who gave up the chance to attend John Hopkins School of Medicine to move to San Diego with her boyfriend Derwin Davis. In the season three finale, Melanie finally marries Derwin during a private ceremony and she eventually finishes medical school, but puts off doing her residency program to be a football wife.
Derwin Davis (Pooch Hall) - Derwin Davis is a wide-reciever for the San Diego Sabers and husband of Melanie Barnett. In the season two finale, he finds out his ex-girlfriend Janay is pregnant with his baby. In the season three finale, Derwin's son is born and he finally marries Melanie in a private ceremony.
Jason Pitts (Coby Bell) - Jason Pitts was the San Diego Sabers team captain and superstar wide receiver. He was married to Kelly Pitts, whom he divorced in season 3. Jason and Kelly have one child, Brittany Pitts. Jason officially cut from the Sabers so he becomes a correspondent on Benched, a sports news television series hosted by former NBA basketball player Chris Webber in season 4.
Kelly Pitts (Brittany Daniel) - Kelly Pitts is the ex-wife of Jason Pitts, mother of Brittany Pitts, and former President of the Sunbeams. Kelly and Jason divorced at the end of season three. At the start of season 4, it is revealed that Kelly is now a reality star, with her own show centered around the ex-wives of professional athletes.
Malik Wright (Hosea Chanchez)- Malik Wright is the San Diego Sabers superstar quarterback and the son of Tasha Mack. He considers himself a playboy and is quite cocky about it. He fired his mom, who was his manager, in season 2. In season 4, Malik is still a cocky, spoiled playboy who is sleeping with the wife of the Sabers' new owner (guest star Meagan Good). Malik gets arrested for assaulting a cop, sleeps with his best-friend’s girl, and has begun to drink heavily.
Latasha "Tasha" Mack (Wendy Raquel Robinson) - Tasha Mack is the mother of Malik Wright and starts off as his manager. Malik eventually fires Tasha. She starts her own management company, but dissolves it to join Irv Smiff Management (ISM). In season three, she falls in love with former NBA basketball player Rick Fox, who also works for ISM. Tasha gets fired from ISM, and dumps Rick, assuming that he knew all about Irv Smith's plans to fire her. Season 4 starts with Tasha as Derwin's agent. She is also dating a much younger man named Donté (played by 106 & Park co-host Terrence J).
For Sassy C~E~O
After being canceled for two years, "The Game" returned Jan. 11 with the premiere of its fourth season. The show was dropped by The CW in 2009 and was picked up early last year by BET.
I was a HUGE fan of the game as I found the show to be entertaining with the perfect combination of drama and humor. However, I must admit I have been dissapointed with the first few episodes of season four. I do however see the potential of things getting better (keeping my fingers crossed). My favorite couple of past seasons is Melanie Barnett and Derwin Davis. I rooted for their love to persevere and followed them through the ups and downs of their relationship. However, this season it appears as if they are making Melanie vendictive, manipulative, and maybe even a little money hungry. I understand jealousy and feel as though it should be addressed, but don’t let it destroy my sweet little Melanie. I still love Derwin’s character. After having some questions regarding the true paternity of his son, he showed heartfelt emotion and even forgave Melanie who wrestled with the decision to tell him the truth about getting bad DNA results and that his son was really his. He also emerged as a superstar player, getting numerous endorsement deals, including Nike, and becoming the new face of the Sabers organization, yet he remains humble. GO DERWIN!!
Another couple who brought fun dynamics to the show is Jason and Kelly. The show focused on Jason’s frugal ways and Kelly’s attempt to gain a sense of self. After dealing with some serious topics such as steroid use, finance issues, and distrust, the couple finally divorced. I am still feeling Jason’s character this season, he is too funny. I’m not sure about Kelly’s new role as a reality TV star yet, I need to see more.
Malik Wright, can you say TRAIN WRECK. I have always liked Malik’s character; a little cocky with a touch of arrogance and a hint of decency. Oh, and it doesn’t hurt that he is fine. I HATE the new direction that Malik’s character is going in. He was always cocky and arrogant, but it is now being overshadowed by obnoxious and uncompassionate behavior. He has turned into a real a**hole with an alcohol problem that is spiraling out of control. I miss the old Malik who use to have a sense of loyalty and respect towards his best-friend, who dated a woman who did not fit the public’s idea of beauty despite being teased about it, and who drew the line when Melanie tried to sleep with him by offering her some good advice and sending her home to work on her relationship with Derwin.
Another great character with a lot of spunk and attitude is Tasha Mac, a hard-working, dedicated, and driven business woman who tells it like it is. But for some strange reason, the writers decided to tag her with even more “ghetto” stereotypes. Don’t get me wrong, I am not judging my Black and Mild smoking sisters, but Tasha went from smoke-free to puffing on a mild…what the f@*k. And what about her much younger man Terrance? Ok, no comment on that, I am 40 something now so I don’t want to have to eat my words.
My final thoughts on THE GAME are that it has lots of potential because fans of the show have already fallen in love with the characters. However, if the writers change the characters too much and they lose a sense of authenticity, I can see a cancellation in the shows near future. I don’t think the show went off of the air because it was a bad show and that is why viewers wrote letters and protested to get the show back on. With that being said, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. If they keep the characters intact and create exciting new story lines that fit those characters, the show should have much success.
THE CAST OF THE GAME
Melanie Barnett-Davis (Tia Mowry) - In season one, Melanie is a medical student who gave up the chance to attend John Hopkins School of Medicine to move to San Diego with her boyfriend Derwin Davis. In the season three finale, Melanie finally marries Derwin during a private ceremony and she eventually finishes medical school, but puts off doing her residency program to be a football wife.
Derwin Davis (Pooch Hall) - Derwin Davis is a wide-reciever for the San Diego Sabers and husband of Melanie Barnett. In the season two finale, he finds out his ex-girlfriend Janay is pregnant with his baby. In the season three finale, Derwin's son is born and he finally marries Melanie in a private ceremony.
Jason Pitts (Coby Bell) - Jason Pitts was the San Diego Sabers team captain and superstar wide receiver. He was married to Kelly Pitts, whom he divorced in season 3. Jason and Kelly have one child, Brittany Pitts. Jason officially cut from the Sabers so he becomes a correspondent on Benched, a sports news television series hosted by former NBA basketball player Chris Webber in season 4.
Kelly Pitts (Brittany Daniel) - Kelly Pitts is the ex-wife of Jason Pitts, mother of Brittany Pitts, and former President of the Sunbeams. Kelly and Jason divorced at the end of season three. At the start of season 4, it is revealed that Kelly is now a reality star, with her own show centered around the ex-wives of professional athletes.
Malik Wright (Hosea Chanchez)- Malik Wright is the San Diego Sabers superstar quarterback and the son of Tasha Mack. He considers himself a playboy and is quite cocky about it. He fired his mom, who was his manager, in season 2. In season 4, Malik is still a cocky, spoiled playboy who is sleeping with the wife of the Sabers' new owner (guest star Meagan Good). Malik gets arrested for assaulting a cop, sleeps with his best-friend’s girl, and has begun to drink heavily.
Latasha "Tasha" Mack (Wendy Raquel Robinson) - Tasha Mack is the mother of Malik Wright and starts off as his manager. Malik eventually fires Tasha. She starts her own management company, but dissolves it to join Irv Smiff Management (ISM). In season three, she falls in love with former NBA basketball player Rick Fox, who also works for ISM. Tasha gets fired from ISM, and dumps Rick, assuming that he knew all about Irv Smith's plans to fire her. Season 4 starts with Tasha as Derwin's agent. She is also dating a much younger man named Donté (played by 106 & Park co-host Terrence J).
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
“Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free…”
By Carlita Campos
For Carlita's Way
That is the quote that is touted by the Statue of Liberty. However today those words no longer ring true, because in the United States the powers that be are trying to close the gates to the huddled masses who yearn for free air. Not to mention revoking the rights of the tired and poor who are already here.
Last year Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed into law immigration bill SB 1070 which at it core would require all immigrants to carry their alien registration documents at all times and requires police to question suspected illegal’s as well as detain anyone who cannot prove they are in the country legally. At the present time the White House is contesting the law in the courts for its Constitutionality so it has yet to take effect.
However this law reminds me of the new hit NBC show The Cape only backwards. In the fictional city of Palm City the evil Ark Corporation is trying to control every aspect of the city by first taking over it’s police force and then its prison system thus creating a complete Police State. And know it or not Arizona’s governor has many connections to private prison companies. And according to Corrections Corporation of America, executives believe immigrant detention is their next big market. And it was in the board room that these same executives decided to make their idea into a bill to be presented to Arizona’s congress to be voted on so that Jan Brewer could make it a law. I can only assume that privatizing the police force is next. And let us not forget other cities have already privatized the Fire Departments.
But unlike a fictional TV show where they have the superhero The Cape to protect them from such a dastardly fate here in the real world a Police State could cause irrefutable damage with no one to protect us. And mind you not to just Arizonians but to all people in the United States of color or anything “they” deem unworthy of sharing in what was the greatness of the country.
Imagine, you’re a resident of any Martin Luther King Blvd/Ave/Parkway in the country who has no family to speak of and you’re hanging on the corner hollerin’ at friends using your street language (ebonics) to communicate. Then some cop rolls up on you and says, “I heard you talking with these guys and it didn’t sound like English to me. Can I see your papers?” And instantly you’re thinking what papers? Because remember you were born in “da hood” and not the barrio so papers were irrelevant. But now they’re needed because some eavesdropping cop with absolute power didn’t understand/recognize your speech when you “axed” your dude a question. And because you have no proof of residency other than a drivers license or state ID you’re arrested and placed in a private jail where you are forced to perform menial labor for free until you can prove you’re from MLK Blvd.
And OK imagine you’re not from da hood or the barrio but you’re not American born and you're at your favorite little coffee spot chatting with some other not born in the USA friends in your native tongue and two donut eating cops walk in and overhear your conversation. And because no one is blue eyed or blonde immediately they demand that the entire group show them your papers. And like the folks from da hood you’re thinking what papers? But when you share this with cops they notice your accent and say, “Here in the USA unless you can prove you’re here legally we’re gonna have to lock you up.” And immediately they take you and the rest of your foreign language speaking cabal off to prison.
My question is this, is this the type of country you want to live in? A country that has the right to detain you because they think you don’t belong? Who is to say who belongs, especially when the native American's look more like Mexican's than the European founding fathers. And if that is the type of country you wish to reside in all I can say is I’m glad I have living elsewhere options because gone are the days of, “America America God shed its grace on thee and crown thy good with brotherhood from sea to shining sea.”
For Carlita's Way
That is the quote that is touted by the Statue of Liberty. However today those words no longer ring true, because in the United States the powers that be are trying to close the gates to the huddled masses who yearn for free air. Not to mention revoking the rights of the tired and poor who are already here.
Last year Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed into law immigration bill SB 1070 which at it core would require all immigrants to carry their alien registration documents at all times and requires police to question suspected illegal’s as well as detain anyone who cannot prove they are in the country legally. At the present time the White House is contesting the law in the courts for its Constitutionality so it has yet to take effect.
However this law reminds me of the new hit NBC show The Cape only backwards. In the fictional city of Palm City the evil Ark Corporation is trying to control every aspect of the city by first taking over it’s police force and then its prison system thus creating a complete Police State. And know it or not Arizona’s governor has many connections to private prison companies. And according to Corrections Corporation of America, executives believe immigrant detention is their next big market. And it was in the board room that these same executives decided to make their idea into a bill to be presented to Arizona’s congress to be voted on so that Jan Brewer could make it a law. I can only assume that privatizing the police force is next. And let us not forget other cities have already privatized the Fire Departments.
But unlike a fictional TV show where they have the superhero The Cape to protect them from such a dastardly fate here in the real world a Police State could cause irrefutable damage with no one to protect us. And mind you not to just Arizonians but to all people in the United States of color or anything “they” deem unworthy of sharing in what was the greatness of the country.
Imagine, you’re a resident of any Martin Luther King Blvd/Ave/Parkway in the country who has no family to speak of and you’re hanging on the corner hollerin’ at friends using your street language (ebonics) to communicate. Then some cop rolls up on you and says, “I heard you talking with these guys and it didn’t sound like English to me. Can I see your papers?” And instantly you’re thinking what papers? Because remember you were born in “da hood” and not the barrio so papers were irrelevant. But now they’re needed because some eavesdropping cop with absolute power didn’t understand/recognize your speech when you “axed” your dude a question. And because you have no proof of residency other than a drivers license or state ID you’re arrested and placed in a private jail where you are forced to perform menial labor for free until you can prove you’re from MLK Blvd.
And OK imagine you’re not from da hood or the barrio but you’re not American born and you're at your favorite little coffee spot chatting with some other not born in the USA friends in your native tongue and two donut eating cops walk in and overhear your conversation. And because no one is blue eyed or blonde immediately they demand that the entire group show them your papers. And like the folks from da hood you’re thinking what papers? But when you share this with cops they notice your accent and say, “Here in the USA unless you can prove you’re here legally we’re gonna have to lock you up.” And immediately they take you and the rest of your foreign language speaking cabal off to prison.
My question is this, is this the type of country you want to live in? A country that has the right to detain you because they think you don’t belong? Who is to say who belongs, especially when the native American's look more like Mexican's than the European founding fathers. And if that is the type of country you wish to reside in all I can say is I’m glad I have living elsewhere options because gone are the days of, “America America God shed its grace on thee and crown thy good with brotherhood from sea to shining sea.”
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Proceed With Caution...
By Briscoe Pugh
For According to Me...By B
Let us all be careful...
One may interpret the recent uprising and revolution in Egypt in many ways, independent of the inspiration one can derive from such collective conviction and unified action.
What is essential is a focus on what is actually at work in such a movement.
The rush to frame the events of the last few weeks centered around Tahrir Square as the culmination of a particular religious influence or political ideology has been evident from the start...and has come from many of the people we have come to expect this very polarizing rhetoric from. Do not subscribe to this way of thinking.
I have seen/heard commentary from those who support various ideas common to a certain “Party” (whose particular moniker I shall not mention, but will say that there is a beverage somewhere therein) which has suggested that President Obama’s support of protest and dissent by the people against Hosni Mubarak makes him a hypocrite. I have heard it said that he “supports revolution everywhere else, but when it is here, in America it gets no support.”
I find this mildly ridiculous for several reasons:
1) Those who belong to the “Party” I mentioned in no way form a suitable comparison to the peoples’ movement we just witness for reasons of financial backing (Egyptians had none),
2) Media access (state-run media was decidedly pro-Mubarak),
3) Basic motives of those involved:
• Egyptians sought the ouster of a dictator who inherited his office (he was Anwar Sadat’s V.P. before Sadat was assassinated), who has suppressed democratic elections, abducted, imprisoned and murdered dissenters/
• ”Beverage Party” sought/seek the ouster of a democratically elected President to uphold tax policy that benefits the rich, prevent aid to the poor, shrink the size and scope of government most of them depend on anyway).
We must all keep at the front of our consciousness that this revolution sprang forth as true movements do. This was a reaction to massive discontent from a large segment of people who are denied basic, human considerations by a few whom have proven that their main goal was to remain in the seat of authority which they have abused for so long.
So...let us be very careful when citing such a movement for our own purposes, unless we seek to claim solidarity against real (not imagined or politically contrived) oppression.
I also believe that the Egyptian people themselves (who valiantly stood for themselves against a regime they’d feared for so long) must be extra careful right now and going forward.
Their movement was just and needed...but the people need strong, articulate voices and the same unity in developing a more proactive form of governance as they had in resisting the one they seek to change.
Care must also be taken with the military presence in this time of transition in Egypt.
Any gaps in or lack of assertive, representative leadership to voice the concerns and needs of the people themselves is extremely dangerous, even with a transitional military government in place. A lengthy political process that the masses don’t see wield tangible results could lead to further protests and the likelihood of the temporary regime to assert a more markedly “military” mandate against the people in response. It is my hope that they stay on the path and lead the rest of the Arab world by example.
Let’s watch. Let’s learn. Let’s examine how a true “grassroots” movement acts to change their circumstance.
For According to Me...By B
Let us all be careful...
One may interpret the recent uprising and revolution in Egypt in many ways, independent of the inspiration one can derive from such collective conviction and unified action.
What is essential is a focus on what is actually at work in such a movement.
The rush to frame the events of the last few weeks centered around Tahrir Square as the culmination of a particular religious influence or political ideology has been evident from the start...and has come from many of the people we have come to expect this very polarizing rhetoric from. Do not subscribe to this way of thinking.
I have seen/heard commentary from those who support various ideas common to a certain “Party” (whose particular moniker I shall not mention, but will say that there is a beverage somewhere therein) which has suggested that President Obama’s support of protest and dissent by the people against Hosni Mubarak makes him a hypocrite. I have heard it said that he “supports revolution everywhere else, but when it is here, in America it gets no support.”
I find this mildly ridiculous for several reasons:
1) Those who belong to the “Party” I mentioned in no way form a suitable comparison to the peoples’ movement we just witness for reasons of financial backing (Egyptians had none),
2) Media access (state-run media was decidedly pro-Mubarak),
3) Basic motives of those involved:
• Egyptians sought the ouster of a dictator who inherited his office (he was Anwar Sadat’s V.P. before Sadat was assassinated), who has suppressed democratic elections, abducted, imprisoned and murdered dissenters/
• ”Beverage Party” sought/seek the ouster of a democratically elected President to uphold tax policy that benefits the rich, prevent aid to the poor, shrink the size and scope of government most of them depend on anyway).
We must all keep at the front of our consciousness that this revolution sprang forth as true movements do. This was a reaction to massive discontent from a large segment of people who are denied basic, human considerations by a few whom have proven that their main goal was to remain in the seat of authority which they have abused for so long.
So...let us be very careful when citing such a movement for our own purposes, unless we seek to claim solidarity against real (not imagined or politically contrived) oppression.
I also believe that the Egyptian people themselves (who valiantly stood for themselves against a regime they’d feared for so long) must be extra careful right now and going forward.
Their movement was just and needed...but the people need strong, articulate voices and the same unity in developing a more proactive form of governance as they had in resisting the one they seek to change.
Care must also be taken with the military presence in this time of transition in Egypt.
Any gaps in or lack of assertive, representative leadership to voice the concerns and needs of the people themselves is extremely dangerous, even with a transitional military government in place. A lengthy political process that the masses don’t see wield tangible results could lead to further protests and the likelihood of the temporary regime to assert a more markedly “military” mandate against the people in response. It is my hope that they stay on the path and lead the rest of the Arab world by example.
Let’s watch. Let’s learn. Let’s examine how a true “grassroots” movement acts to change their circumstance.
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
A MESSAGE TO THE YOUNG LADIES
By Celena Howard The Sassy~Cee~E~O
I offer my hand to the young ladies out here in search of mentorship and guidance. To the young ladies who are not afraid to dream and believe in greatness, those who are filled with hope and optimism and the awareness that with the proper guidance and support their possibilities are endless. I offer my hand to the motherless child as well as the child with the mother who can use a little support, to the young ladies who are willing to trade bad habits and negative thinking for a positive image and optimistic future. I offer my hand to the ladies who have been so inflicted by low self-esteem that they have allowed themselves to be used and abused in order to be accepted. I offer my hand to the young ladies who are so full of themselves that they scoff at those that are in need and turn a deaf ear to those who dare to ask. To the young ladies that have placed themselves so high above everyone else that they are almost impossible to reach, not even realizing that the fall back down to reality is going to be much more painful. I offer young ladies the reassurance that I have made many of their same mistakes and have developed some wisdom and knowledge that could be beneficial if they are willing to receive it. I offer them the reassurance that things are never as bad as they seem at that very moment and that time can heal all things.
I have a desire to help our youth by being a positive role model and mentor. My mission is to make a difference in the lives of young ladies in search of positive motivation and guidance. There are many adults who share my same desire to help and are willing and available to mentor our youth, so young ladies grab the hand of a positive role model, mentor, relative, church member, teacher, or trusted friend and learn, grow and persevere towards greatness. But always remember that GOD has given you two hands. Your other hand is there for you to offer to another young lady looking for the same guidance and support so offer it freely and with heartfelt conviction.
Be blessed and successful on your journey through life.
If you are interested in learning about my Youth Network Program check out the following link for eligibility requirements and program details. http://www.cejapublishing.com/ceja_publishings_youth_network
I offer my hand to the young ladies out here in search of mentorship and guidance. To the young ladies who are not afraid to dream and believe in greatness, those who are filled with hope and optimism and the awareness that with the proper guidance and support their possibilities are endless. I offer my hand to the motherless child as well as the child with the mother who can use a little support, to the young ladies who are willing to trade bad habits and negative thinking for a positive image and optimistic future. I offer my hand to the ladies who have been so inflicted by low self-esteem that they have allowed themselves to be used and abused in order to be accepted. I offer my hand to the young ladies who are so full of themselves that they scoff at those that are in need and turn a deaf ear to those who dare to ask. To the young ladies that have placed themselves so high above everyone else that they are almost impossible to reach, not even realizing that the fall back down to reality is going to be much more painful. I offer young ladies the reassurance that I have made many of their same mistakes and have developed some wisdom and knowledge that could be beneficial if they are willing to receive it. I offer them the reassurance that things are never as bad as they seem at that very moment and that time can heal all things.
I have a desire to help our youth by being a positive role model and mentor. My mission is to make a difference in the lives of young ladies in search of positive motivation and guidance. There are many adults who share my same desire to help and are willing and available to mentor our youth, so young ladies grab the hand of a positive role model, mentor, relative, church member, teacher, or trusted friend and learn, grow and persevere towards greatness. But always remember that GOD has given you two hands. Your other hand is there for you to offer to another young lady looking for the same guidance and support so offer it freely and with heartfelt conviction.
Be blessed and successful on your journey through life.
If you are interested in learning about my Youth Network Program check out the following link for eligibility requirements and program details. http://www.cejapublishing.com/ceja_publishings_youth_network
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Coming Back Soon!
That's right Friends the talented writers of the collaborative blog Unified Scribble will be back. Yes that's right the powerful, insightful and opinionated Scribes of Unified Scribble have taken a break for the holidays. And just like before Unified Scribble will offer poignant stories of triumph over adversity, political, pop culture, health, and lifestyle editorials and commentary.
We're always looking for ways to better your encounter with us and we are excited by you, our readers. Therefore we welcome your reactions and feedback and hope that during your time on our site, you are as inspired by us as we are by you... And don't forget to "Follow"!
Also enjoy your holiday's!
We're always looking for ways to better your encounter with us and we are excited by you, our readers. Therefore we welcome your reactions and feedback and hope that during your time on our site, you are as inspired by us as we are by you... And don't forget to "Follow"!
Also enjoy your holiday's!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)